IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Questions and Responses

 IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Question and Response

IELTS Writing Samples

Sample Question 1: In the modern world, it is possible to communicate with people via the Internet without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development?

Sample Response

In recent years, the rise of the internet has revolutionized the way we communicate, making it possible to interact with others without the need for face-to-face meetings. While some view this shift as a negative development, I believe the convenience and global connectivity it offers make it a largely positive change. 

On the one hand, there are concerns that online communication reduces personal interaction, which could lead to a sense of isolation. People may become more dependent on digital devices, neglecting real-life relationships and social skills. For instance, children and teenagers might struggle with face-to-face communication as they spend more time engaging in virtual conversations. Furthermore, there is the potential for misunderstandings, as online lacks non-verbal cues such as body language, which are essential for effective interaction. 

On the other hand, the advantages of internet communication far outweigh the drawbacks. First, it allows people to connect globally, bridging distances and cultural barriers that would have been impossible in the past. For example, friends and families can stay in touch despite living in different countries, and businesses can collaborate seamlessly across borders. In addition, digital communication provides flexibility, enabling individuals to converse at their own convenience without the need for time-consuming travel. This is a particularly valuable in the professional world, where remote work and virtual meetings are becoming increasingly common. 

In conclusion, while face-to-face interaction remains important, the ability to communicate via the internet has undeniably enhanced our ability to connect with others. The positives, including increased accessibility, global reach, and convenience, make it a highly beneficial development in the modern world. 

Sample Question 2: The values that we learn from our parents and family have a greater influence on our future success than the knowledge and skills we learn at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Sample Response

It is often argued that the values instilled by parents and family play a more significant role in determining an individual's future success than the education they receive at school. While I acknowledge the importance of family values, I believe that the knowledge and skills learned in formal education are equally, if not more, important in shaping a person's success. 

On the one hand, the family environment provides a foundation for the development of character and personal values. Parents and caregivers impart crucial life skills such as discipline, hard work, and emotional intelligence. These values influences how individuals approach challenges and interact with others, which can undoubtedly impact their career success. For example, a child who grows up in a supportive and encouraging environment may develop a strong sense of self-confidence and resilience, both of which are essential for success in any field. 

On the other hand, the knowledge and skills gained at school are vital for equipping individuals with the expertise necessary to thrive in today's competitive world. Schools provide specialized education in subjects such as mathematics, science, and literature, which are essential for many career paths. Additionally, schools foster critical thinking, problem-solving, and collaboration, all of which are valuable skills in the workplace. In many fields, success is often directly related to the level of education and technical knowledge one possesses. 

In conclusion, while the values taught by parents are undeniably important in shaping a person's character, the knowledge and skills acquired through formal education are just as crucial for achieving long-term success. Both elements are essential, and their influence varies depending on the individual's goals and career aspirations. 

Sample Question 3: Nowadays, people believe that governments should invest taxpayers’ money in healthcare, while others believe that money should be used in other areas. Discuss both points of view and give your opinion.

Sample Response

In many countries, there is an ongoing debate regarding how government funds should be allocated, particularly when it comes to the use of taxpayers' money. While some argue that investing in healthcare should be the top priority, others believe that other sectors, such as education or infrastructure, should receive greater attention. In this essay, I will examine both perspectives before providing my opinion. 

On the one hand, there are compelling reasons to prioritise healthcare spending. A well-functioning healthcare system is crucial for ensuring the well-being of citizens, and a government's first responsibility is to protect its population. Investment in healthcare can lead to improved life expectancy, lower diseases rates, and a better quality of life. Additionally, healthy individuals contribute to a more productive workforce, which can stimulates economic growth. For example, public health initiatives, such as vaccination programs, have proven to be highly effective in preventing widespread diseases, ultimately saving money in the long term.

On the other hand, those who argue against prioritizing healthcare funding often point out that other sectors, such as education, infrastructure, or environmental sustainability, are equally important for a nation's development. For example, investing in education can lead to a more skilled workforce, fostering innovation and economic advancement. Similarly, improved infrastructure, such as transportation systems and energy grids, can enhance quality of life and support economic growth. In countries with large, aging populations, healthcare costs can become unsustainable, making it essential for governments balance spending across various sectors. 

In my view, while healthcare is undeniably crucial, it should not be considered in isolation. Governments should allocate funds to ensure the long-term development of a society, which includes not only healthcare but also education, infrastructure, and other essential services. A balanced approach that address the needs of all sectors will lead to more sustainable and equitable growth. 

In conclusion, while there are strong arguments for prioritizing healthcare, I believe that a more balanced approach is necessary to ensure that all sectors receive the investment they need for the future prosperity of the country. 

Sample Question 4: Large companies should pay CEOs and executives higher salaries than other workers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Sample Response

In many large corporations, executives and CEOs often earn significantly higher salaries compared to other employees. While some argue that this disparity is justified due to the responsibility and decision-making power these leader hold, I believe that such high pay gaps are not always warranted, and the focus should shift towards a more equitable distribution of income within a company. 

On the one hand, supporters of higher pay for CEOs argue that these individuals are responsible for steering the direction of the company, making critical decisions, and taking on significant risks. Their leadership can have a profound impact on the company's success, which in turn benefits employees, shareholders, and the economy. For instance, successful executives who innovate or expand a company can lead to substantial profits, providing more opportunities for the workforce. Moreover, highly skilled and experienced leaders are often in high demand, and competitive salaries are necessary to attract the best talent. 

However, the argument for inflated salaries at the corporate leader often overlooks the issue of income inequality. In many cases, the compensation packages for CEOs and executives are disproportionate compared to the wags of average workers, which can lead to discontent and low morale among staff. A company that rewards its top executives with excessive pay create a culture of disparity, which undermines the collective effort of all employees who contribute to its success. Furthermore, a growing body of research suggests that the link between high executive salaries and company performance is often weak, with many CEOs receiving exorbitant pay. 

In conclusion, while it is understandable that CEOs and executives should be well-compensated for their expertise and responsibilities, the level of their salaries should be more proportional to the value they bring to the organisaiton. A fairer wage distribution would not only improve employee morale but also foster a more sustainable and harmonious workplace culture. 

Sample Question 5: In some countries worldwide, men and women have children at a later age than in the past. What are the reasons for this development? What are the effects on society and family life?

Sample Response

In recent decades, there has been a noticeable trend of men and women having children later in life in various countries. This shift can be attributed to a combination of social, economic, and cultural factors. While this change has several benefits, it also has certain consequences for both individuals and society as a whole. 

One of the primary reasons for delayed childbearing is the increasing focus on education and career development. Both men and women today prioritise their academic and professional goals, with many individuals choosing to establish their careers before starting a family. This trend is especially evident in urban areas where living costs are higher, and financial stability is often a prerequisite for having children. Furthermore, the rise of women's empowerment and greater access to contraception has given women more control over their reproductive choices, enabling them to delay motherhood until they feel ready. 

Another significant factor contributing to this shift is the changing societal norms around family life. In the past, people often married and had children at a younger age, as it was seen as a social expectation. However, as societal attitudes evolve, there is less pressure to adhere to healthcare, people also feel that they have more time to delay parenthood without compromising their fertility. However, they have more time to delay parenthood without compromising their fertility. 

However, this trend of delayed childbearing has some potential drawbacks. One of the most notable effects is the increased risk of fertility problems. As women age, their fertility declines, making it more difficult to conceive. Additionally, older parents may experience challenges related to balancing the demands of parenting with their professional and social lives. On a societal level, a delay in childbearing may lead to an aging population, which can place additional strain on healthcare and social services in the future, as fewer young people enter the workforce to support an older generation. 

In conclusion, while the trend of having children later in life is largely driven by positive changes in societal values and individual priorities, it also presents challenges related to fertility and demographic shifts. It is essential for governments and societies to address these by providing adequate support for both younger and older parents to ensure a balanced and sustainable population structure.